Skip to content

⚠︎ Risk warning: leveraged derivatives on unregulated platforms — you can lose everything you deposit. Not investment advice.

Comparison · By · Updated 2026-09-30

Hyperliquid vs Vest Markets (2026): Crypto vs Stocks

Facts verified against each venue's official docs on 2026-09-30. Any comparison of volume or liquidity reflects a point-in-time reading that moves constantly — treat it as a reading, not a fixed ranking.

Hyperliquid is a crypto-first order book that matches and settles on its own L1. Vest Markets is built for US stocks, indices and FX: it matches off-chain, prices risk through its zkRisk engine, keeps balances on Base and charges no fee on stocks during US sessions. Our Vest review covers the model and its incident record.

Note on jurisdiction: both venues block US persons. Vest's Terms also prohibit the United Kingdom, China (including Hong Kong and Macao) and others. Check each venue's own terms before signing up.

Verdict

Different shelves. For US stocks and index futures in market hours, Vest's zero fee is hard to beat. For crypto, Hyperliquid offers far more markets, isolated margin and 24/7 trading without a weekend pause. Vest's record in 2026 includes a full platform rollback after a pricing bug, and it runs on a single validator with a last-trade mark price. Pick Vest for stock perps in US hours; pick Hyperliquid for crypto on a book that trades around the clock.

At a glance

Hyperliquid versus Vest, compared across key dimensions
Hyperliquid Vest
Model On-chain order book, own L1 Off-chain matching, zkRisk pricing, state on Base; one validator
Markets Broad crypto set 88 trading (API): 74 stock/ETF/index, 9 FX, 5 crypto
Fees (base) 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker Stocks 0% in US hours; FX 0% weekdays; crypto 0.01% per side
Max leverage Up to 40x Docs: up to 50x
Margin Cross or isolated WINNER Cross only
Hours 24/7 Crypto 24/7; everything else 24/5 since 31 July 2026
Token HYPE (live) None; weekly points
Operating entity Blocks US · own L1 Vest Exchange Inc. (Panama); prohibits US, UK, China +

facts verified · each venue's docs

Fees

Hyperliquid runs 0.045% taker / 0.015% maker at the base tier, reduced by volume tiers and HYPE staking — see our full breakdown. Vest charges by session: no fee on stocks from 4 AM to 8 PM EST on weekdays, 0.05% overnight, no fee on FX on weekdays, and 0.01% to open or close crypto, with zkRisk premia and funding on top. The Vest fees page has the table.

Where Vest wins

Where Hyperliquid wins

Which to pick

If you trade US stocks or index futures in market hours and accept cross margin and Vest's incident record, Vest fits. For crypto, Hyperliquid is the default — read our full Hyperliquid review, and weigh both against the field in our perp DEX rankings.

Related comparisons

Venue reviews: Hyperliquid review · Vest Markets review

FAQ

Is Vest a DEX?

Balances and positions are kept on Base and verified by zero-knowledge proofs; matching and pricing run off-chain, and one validator verifies state transitions today.

Which is cheaper?

For stocks in US hours, Vest, at no fee. For crypto, Vest's 0.01% per side undercuts Hyperliquid's base taker rate before premia and funding. The fee comparison lists both with their verification dates.

Do I need KYC on either?

Neither venue's sign-up describes an identity step.

Perpetual futures carry substantial risk regardless of venue — see our risk disclosure before trading either exchange.

Open Hyperliquid → (opens in a new tab)

the Hyperliquid link is an affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you; no commercial relationship with Vest · methodology