Skip to content

⚠︎ Risk warning: leveraged derivatives on unregulated platforms — you can lose everything you deposit. Not investment advice.

Comparison · By · Updated 2026-09-25

Aster vs SoDEX (2026): 0% Maker vs Published Leverage

Two order-book venues with live tokens, running points programmes and stock perps, that price makers differently and hold funds differently. Aster is a public book on BNB Chain with 0% maker from the first trade. SoDEX matches on a perps appchain of SoSoValue's ValueChain, starts makers at 0.012% and takers at 0.040%, and holds deposits with institutional custodians.

Verdict

Aster for makers and breadth; SoDEX for published leverage, at a custody cost. Aster's zero maker needs no tier, and its market list is far longer. SoDEX publishes a leverage cap per market and offers a staking discount and maker rebates, but its deposits rest with custodians and its only named company disclaims operating the venue. Both run points programmes that point at a token distribution without publishing a ratio.

At a glance

Aster versus SoDEX, compared across key dimensions
Aster SoDEX
Architecture BNB Chain · order book On-chain order book · ValueChain perps appchain
Custody Self-custody Deposits held by custodians (Cobo, Ceffu, Coinbase), mirrored 1:1 on-chain
KYC None No identity step in onboarding docs; KYT/KYA screening; Terms exclude US, China, Singapore, UK +
Base perp fees 0.04% (USDT-margined) / 0.005% (USD1-margined) / 0.009% (RWA) / 0% t/m 0.040% → 0.022% (by tier) / 0.012% → 0% (by tier) t/m
Funding 8h default; per-symbol 1h/4h/8h via the API Hourly · docs cap 4% per hour
Token $ASTER · live (TGE claim window 17 Sep – 17 Oct 2025) SOSO · live (ValueChain gas and governance)
Points programme Active · Aster Convergence: Stage 6 Active · SoPoints — Layer 1 Season (from 1 September 2026, 20 weeks)
Operating entity / access US access unverified Finova Holdings Limited (Cayman), interface only; disclaims operating SoDEX

facts verified · each venue's official docs Every cell restates a claim on one of this site's pages: /compare/hyperliquid-vs-aster/ , /aster/fees/ , /sodex/ , /sodex/how-to-start/ , /sodex/fees/ , /airdrops/ .

Fees

Aster — Order-book maker/taker; three perp contract families (USDT, USD1, RWA) with different taker rates; Shield Mode and 1001x use their own fee rules. Base tier: 0.04% (USDT-margined) / 0.005% (USD1-margined) / 0.009% (RWA) taker, 0% maker. Taker numeric uses the USDT-margined family; USD1-margined trades at 0.005% — pick per family when calculating. Discounts: 5% off when fees are paid in ASTER; spot VIP grid 4.0→2.3 bps taker by 14-day volume and ASTER held; market-maker rebates to −0.5 bps; referral rebate up to 10% (referrer-configured split, not guaranteed). 0% maker means maker-heavy flow pays nothing — and generates no referral commission. Schedule verified 2026-09-16 on /aster/fees/.

SoDEX — Order-book maker/taker on SoSoValue's ValueChain; seven tiers on 14-day weighted volume (perps + 2× spot). Base tier: 0.040% → 0.022% (by tier) taker, 0.012% → 0% (by tier) maker. Numerics are tier 0 (≤ $5,000,000 of 14-day weighted volume); the public perps API carries the same 0.0004 / 0.00012 on every market. Discounts: Staking SOSO takes 5% to 40% off; makers above 0.50% / 1.50% / 3.00% of 14-day maker volume earn −0.001% / −0.002% / −0.003% instead of the tier maker fee. Deposits are held by institutional custodians and mirrored 1:1 on ValueChain; a separate docs page still quotes testnet rates (0.05% / 0.02%), superseded by the tier schedule dated 13 March. Schedule verified 2026-09-24 on /sodex/fees/.

Base-tier rates answer one narrow question — what a small taker order costs on day one. Your maker/taker mix, volume tier and holding period decide the real number; the fee comparison lays all 15 venues side by side and the execution-cost tool adds live slippage on top.

Markets they share

In this site's market join, snapshot 2026-09-25, Aster lists 565 perp markets and SoDEX lists 91; 84 appear on both. The market index shows every asset with the venues that list it and each venue's published leverage, and the join is refreshed weekly by a fail-closed pipeline. Breadth is not depth: a listing says nothing about how much size a book absorbs, which the execution-cost tool measures live where a venue publishes its order book.

Token and points

Both rows are restated from the points & airdrop tracker, which is re-read against each venue's docs on a 45-day cadence and never prices a point.

Where Aster wins

Maker cost and the shelf. Makers pay 0% on both perp families with nothing to unlock, against SoDEX's 0.012% at tier 0. Aster's contract list is the largest of the two by a wide margin, with more stock-tagged markets. The book is public on BNB Chain, no identity step is in the docs, and $ASTER is live.

Where SoDEX wins

Published leverage, collateral and fee routes. SoDEX's market list states a maximum leverage for every market — 40x on BTC and ETH — where Aster's does not publish one. Cross margin counts BTC, ETH, gold and other assets at a haircut, SOSO staking cuts fees, and makers with a high share of volume earn rebates. The Hyperliquid vs SoDEX page covers the custody model in detail.

What this site could not verify

Which to pick

For zero-cost maker flow, the longer market list and a public BNB Chain book, Aster. For a published leverage cap, multi-asset collateral and a staking route to lower fees, after accepting that deposits sit with named custodians, SoDEX. Aster's US access is unverified either way; SoDEX's Terms exclude the United States, China, Singapore, the United Kingdom and others. The Aster review and the SoDEX review carry the detail behind each cell.

Related comparisons

FAQ

Which is cheaper for a taker?

At the entry level they match: Aster's USDT-perp taker rate is 0.04%, SoDEX tier 0 is 0.040%. Aster's other perp families carry lower taker rates, shown in the fees table above, and a SOSO stake lowers SoDEX's.

Which points programme is further along?

Both are running. Aster's Stage 6 points accrue toward an $ASTER allocation; SoDEX's SoPoints Layer 1 Season feeds a future SOSO airdrop. Neither publishes a conversion ratio.

Is either a safer place to hold funds?

This site has no custody finding against Aster's BNB Chain contracts. SoDEX's docs say deposits are held by institutional custodians and mirrored on-chain; see the risk disclosure.

Open Aster → (opens in a new tab)

affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you · methodology