Skip to content

⚠︎ Risk warning: leveraged derivatives on unregulated platforms — you can lose everything you deposit. Not investment advice.

Comparison · By · Updated 2026-09-24

Aster vs ApeX Omni (2026): 0% Maker vs 100x Tiers

Two order-book venues with live tokens and non-crypto perps, priced very differently at the maker side. Aster is a public book on BNB Chain with 0% maker from the first trade and Stage 6 points that its docs tie to an $ASTER airdrop. ApeX Omni matches orders off-chain and settles on zkLink Nova, starts makers at 0.020% and takers at 0.050%, and lowers both through seven levels set by volume or by APEX staked.

Verdict

Aster for makers and an open airdrop path; ApeX for published leverage caps, at a custody cost. Aster's zero maker needs no tier, and its points programme names a destination. ApeX publishes a per-contract leverage cap — 100x on BTC and ETH — and keeps its stock, index and commodity perps in a separate account, but its settlement layer is marked CRITICAL by L2BEAT and its Ape Season 1 points programme has ended with no stated conversion.

At a glance

Aster versus ApeX Omni, compared across key dimensions
Aster ApeX Omni
Architecture BNB Chain · order book Off-chain order book · zkLink Nova settlement
Custody Self-custody Wallet or email account; zkLink contracts L2BEAT rates CRITICAL (EOA-upgradeable, no exit window)
KYC None No identity step in onboarding docs; Terms bar the US + sanctioned list
Base perp fees 0.04% (USDT-margined) / 0.005% (USD1-margined) / 0.009% (RWA) / 0% t/m WINNER 0.050% → 0.025% (by tier) / 0.020% → 0% (by tier) t/m
Funding 8h default; per-symbol 1h/4h/8h via the API Hourly · docs cap ±0.05% per hour
Token $ASTER · live (TGE claim window 17 Sep – 17 Oct 2025) APEX · live
Points programme Active · Aster Convergence: Stage 6 Ended
Operating entity / access US access unverified APEX DAO Inc. (Panama law) per Terms; CoinGecko lists Saint Vincent

facts verified · each venue's official docs Every cell restates a claim on one of this site's pages: /compare/hyperliquid-vs-aster/ , /aster/fees/ , /apex/ , /apex/how-to-start/ , /apex/fees/ , /airdrops/ .

Fees

Aster — Order-book maker/taker; three perp contract families (USDT, USD1, RWA) with different taker rates; Shield Mode and 1001x use their own fee rules. Base tier: 0.04% (USDT-margined) / 0.005% (USD1-margined) / 0.009% (RWA) taker, 0% maker. Taker numeric uses the USDT-margined family; USD1-margined trades at 0.005% — pick per family when calculating. Discounts: 5% off when fees are paid in ASTER; spot VIP grid 4.0→2.3 bps taker by 14-day volume and ASTER held; market-maker rebates to −0.5 bps; referral rebate up to 10% (referrer-configured split, not guaranteed). 0% maker means maker-heavy flow pays nothing — and generates no referral commission. Schedule verified 2026-09-16 on /aster/fees/.

ApeX Omni — Order-book maker/taker; seven VIP levels set daily by 14-day volume or APEX/esAPEX staked. Base tier: 0.050% → 0.025% (by tier) taker, 0.020% → 0% (by tier) maker. Numerics are Level 1; levels are recalculated daily from 14-day Omni Perps volume or APEX/esAPEX staked (staking counts up to Level 4 only). Discounts: Levels 2–7 take taker from 0.045% to 0.025% and maker from 0.015% to 0% (zero maker from $500m of 14-day volume); referral discounts do not stack with VIP levels. Cross margin only, on a settlement layer (zkLink Nova) L2BEAT rates CRITICAL; the docs cap hourly funding at ±0.05% but the symbols API shows wider per-contract fundingMaxRate values on some long-tail markets. Schedule verified 2026-09-24 on /apex/fees/.

Base-tier rates answer one narrow question — what a small taker order costs on day one. Your maker/taker mix, volume tier and holding period decide the real number; the fee comparison lays all 14 venues side by side and the execution-cost tool adds live slippage on top.

Markets they share

In this site's market join, snapshot 2026-09-24, Aster lists 566 perp markets and ApeX Omni lists 127; 122 appear on both. The market index shows every asset with the venues that list it and each venue's published leverage, and the join is refreshed weekly by a fail-closed pipeline. Breadth is not depth: a listing says nothing about how much size a book absorbs, which the execution-cost tool measures live where a venue publishes its order book.

Token and points

Both rows are restated from the points & airdrop tracker, which is re-read against each venue's docs on a 45-day cadence and never prices a point.

Where Aster wins

Maker cost and the points path. Makers pay 0% on both perp families with nothing to unlock, against ApeX's 0.020% at Level 1. The book is public on BNB Chain, no identity step is in the docs, and $ASTER is live with a running points stage whose docs name an airdrop. ApeX's points season is over, and Season 2 is only "coming soon".

Where ApeX Omni wins

Published leverage and a staking route to lower fees. ApeX's symbols API states a leverage cap for every contract — 100x on BTC and ETH, 50x on most others — where Aster's market list does not publish one. Its levels can be bought by staking APEX or esAPEX up to Level 4, and staking pays weekly rewards from fee buybacks. Aster lists more stock-tagged contracts; ApeX keeps its stock, index and commodity perps in a separate TradFi account on Chainlink prices. The Hyperliquid vs ApeX page covers the custody question in detail.

What this site could not verify

Which to pick

For zero-cost maker flow, a live token with an active points stage and a public BNB Chain book, Aster. For a published leverage cap, a staking route to lower fees and stock or commodity perps beside crypto, after sizing the balance for the L2BEAT finding, ApeX Omni. Aster's US access is unverified either way; ApeX's Terms bar the United States. The Aster review and the ApeX Omni review carry the detail behind each cell.

Related comparisons

FAQ

Which is cheaper for a taker?

Aster at its USDT-perp rate of 0.04% taker, against ApeX's 0.050% at Level 1; ApeX drops to 0.025% only at Level 7. Aster's other perp families carry lower taker rates, shown in the fees table above.

Where are the stock and commodity perps?

On both. Aster's classification tags stock, ETF and commodity contracts in its market list; ApeX keeps them in a separate TradFi account with its own margin pool, closed on weekends and US public holidays.

Is either a safer place to hold funds?

This site has no custody finding against Aster's BNB Chain contracts. ApeX's zkLink Nova settlement is rated CRITICAL by L2BEAT for single-key upgrades with no exit window; see the risk disclosure.

Open Aster → (opens in a new tab)

affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you · methodology