Skip to content

⚠︎ Risk warning: leveraged derivatives on unregulated platforms — you can lose everything you deposit. Not investment advice.

Comparison · By · Updated 2026-10-05

Lighter vs Nado (2026): Two Order Books, Two Fee Models

Both run a public central-limit order book and both list stock and FX perps beside crypto. Lighter is a zero-knowledge rollup on Ethereum whose Standard accounts pay nothing. Nado matches in an off-chain sequencer on Ink and settles in USDT0, with spot, perps and borrowing netted in one unified margin account.

Verdict

Lighter on cost and settlement; Nado on cross-product margin. Lighter Standard charges 0% maker and 0% taker and settles through validity proofs to Ethereum. Nado starts at 0.035% taker and 0.01% maker, falling with volume, but lets spot holdings and borrowing offset perp risk in one account. Nado's docs publish no audits, and losses beyond its insurance fund can reach USDT0 balances.

At a glance

Lighter versus Nado, compared across key dimensions
Lighter Nado
Architecture zk-rollup on Ethereum Off-chain sequencer + on-chain clearinghouse · Ink L2
Custody Non-custodial (rollup) On-chain contracts on Ink; the sequencer "holds no custody"
KYC Not stated No identity step for wallet or social login; the card route via Fun.xyz may ask for basic KYC
Base perp fees 0% (Standard) / 0.0280% (Premium) / 0% (Standard) / 0.0040% (Premium) t/m WINNER 0.035% → 0.015% (by tier) / 0.01% → −0.008% (by tier) t/m
Funding 1h period · P2P Hourly · capped at ±2% per day
Token LIT · live WINNER None named in the docs
Points programme Unverified · Points Season 2 Active · Nado Points — Season 2 (from 21 May 2026)
Operating entity / access US, Canada, UK among 14 barred (Terms) Spira Arc Inc. (Panama); restricts US, Canada, Panama

facts verified · each venue's official docs Every cell restates a claim on one of this site's pages: /compare/hyperliquid-vs-lighter/ , /lighter/fees/ , /eu/lighter/ , /nado/ , /nado/how-to-start/ , /nado/fees/ , /airdrops/ .

Fees

Lighter — Order-book; zero-fee Standard accounts, paid Premium tier for lower latency, Plus tier for higher rate limits. Base tier: 0% (Standard) / 0.0280% (Premium) taker, 0% (Standard) / 0.0040% (Premium) maker. Numerics reflect Standard accounts (zero-fee); Premium trades 0.0040%/0.0280% with a LIT-staking discount grid. Discounts: LIT staking reduces Premium rates on a published grid. Standard’s trade-off is latency (300ms taker) and API rate limits, not hidden fees or position caps; LIT is live (staking discounts the Premium grid) and the points program remains a separate, conversion-undocumented track. Schedule verified 2026-09-16 on /lighter/fees/.

Nado — Order-book maker/taker (off-chain sequencer, on-chain clearinghouse on Ink); seven VIP tiers on 30-day spot + perp volume. Base tier: 0.035% → 0.015% (by tier) taker, 0.01% → −0.008% (by tier) maker. Numerics are VIP 0 ($0 of 30-day volume), read from the fee-schedule image; the public gateway API carries the same 0.00035 / 0.0001 on 76 of 82 perps. FX perps use a lower schedule from 0.70 bps taker / 0.20 bps maker. Discounts: VIP tiers on 30-day volume reach 1.5 bps taker and a −0.8 bp maker rebate at $1B; referral codes with a kickback return part of fees. Flat sequencer fees apply (1 USDT0 per withdrawal, 1 USDT0 per liquidation); the fees page's worked example still calls the top tier "$5B+", superseded by the Season 2 schedule. Schedule verified 2026-09-30 on /nado/fees/.

Base-tier rates answer one narrow question — what a small taker order costs on day one. Your maker/taker mix, volume tier and holding period decide the real number; the fee comparison lays all 20 venues side by side and the execution-cost tool adds live slippage on top.

Markets they share

In this site's market join, snapshot 2026-10-05, Lighter lists 210 perp markets and Nado lists 75; 69 appear on both. The market index shows every asset with the venues that list it and each venue's published leverage, and the join is refreshed weekly by a fail-closed pipeline. Breadth is not depth: a listing says nothing about how much size a book absorbs, which the execution-cost tool measures live where a venue publishes its order book.

Token and points

Both rows are restated from the points & airdrop tracker, which is re-read against each venue's docs on a 45-day cadence and never prices a point.

Where Lighter wins

Fees and settlement. Standard accounts pay nothing on every market. Settlement rolls up to Ethereum with validity proofs. LIT is live. Lighter's docs describe wallet-based onboarding with no identity step, recorded as unverified rather than promised.

Where Nado wins

One account for everything. Nado's unified margin nets spot, perps and money-market borrowing, so a hedge needs less collateral, and tokenized stocks can count as margin. Its fee tiers reach a maker rebate at high volume. The Hyperliquid vs Nado page covers the model and its risks.

What this site could not verify

Which to pick

For zero commission and Ethereum-anchored settlement, Lighter. For spot, perps and borrowing in one netted account, and after accepting unpublished audits and loss socialization, Nado. Both restrict the United States and Canada among others. The Lighter review and the Nado review carry the detail.

Related comparisons

FAQ

How far apart are the fees?

At the entry level, all of Nado's fee: Lighter Standard charges 0%, Nado VIP 0 charges 0.035% taker and 0.01% maker.

Which is safer to hold a balance on?

On the evidence this site has, Lighter: it settles through validity proofs to Ethereum. Nado's docs describe socializing losses to USDT0 balances if its insurance fund is exhausted, and publish no audits.

Do they list the same markets?

The shared-markets count above comes from this site's coverage snapshot, which reads both venues' public market lists.

Open Lighter → (opens in a new tab)

affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you · methodology